I picked this rod up Monday morning from the Orvis shop in Dallas. I had been considering a Cabela's 1wt, a TFO Finesse 1 wt, and a Sage TXL 0 wt. I'm embarrassed to admit my method of determining the winner... which was that the Orvis rod was the only one in stock in any of the area shops
. This is surprising seeing how TFO is actually a Dallas-based company and it still would have taken the local TFO dealer until Friday to get a 1 wt in for me to try out.
When it became apparent that I couldn't try a TFO until the end of this week, I called around looking for the Sage, and again--no one had one in stock. So I did what any impatient angler would do--I stopped by Orvis while literally on my way out of town for a 3 day fishing trip. Orvis had the 1 wt in stock, the salesperson (I hate to call him that because it was obvious that this guy really knew his stuff) was very helpful--they didn't have a good 1 wt line on a reel for test casting, so he grabbed a new line and got it on the reel complete with leader and yarn-fly in about 3 minutes. I spent about 5-10 minutes casting in the parking lot (on a very windy day), and could tell that I was going to like this rod. I asked if they had any kind of package deal if I buy the rod, line, and a new spool (I already have a BBS I). He said he'd throw the line in no charge, so we went back in, he grabbed a new spool, filled it with backing (again no charge), and grabbed another new line--Wonderline 3rd Gen Trout WF1--and grabbed a brand-new unopened 1 wt rod, which he looked over very closely before sending me on my way.
Up until now my UL gear has consisted of a 7'9" Sage LL 2 wt. This is a pretty fast rod and for smaller creeks and rivers I overline it with a 3wt line. It casts beautifully and can handle fairly large flies. It feels just a little stiff with small to medium-sized bream on it though, so I was wanting to try something lighter with more of a medium action. (I also have a couple 4 wts but since they're "heavy gear" I won't go there
).
Once I got on the river it took me about 30 minutes or so before I felt like I was getting the feel for what the Orvis 1 wt could do and how it needed to be handled. I tried several flies, working my way up from a size 20 BWO, to a 16 Beadhead Pheasant Tail, and finally to a size 10 Beadhead Woolly Bugger. I was very happy to learn that the slower action of the Orvis 1 wt actually helped me cast the heavier Woolly Bugger better than my 2 wt. The slower action seems to smooth out the jerk I sometimes feel on the backcast with my 2 wt where I can feel the weight of beadhead as the leader straightens (hope that makes sense). Bottom line is that it handles a soaking wet size 10 beadhead woolly bugger with no problems, and that's about as heavy as I'm likely to go.
I made the mistake of taking hip waders on this trip instead of chest waders, and found the water a little higher than I expected. It seemed like I was constantly getting to the limits of my waders while the spots I wanted to cast to were a little further away than I would prefer. This forced me to spend a lot of time casting 30' to 40', over and over again. Usually with a light rod I'm casting 20' - 30' feet, so this really showed me what this new rod would do. I'm happy to say that consistent 40' casts are no problem--even with the Beadhead Woolly Bugger I mentioned above. I was a little surprised by this, but very pleased. The rod also handled well with quite a bit of line in the air.
This rod is 7'6" long. When I first started shopping for a 1 wt, I was hoping to find something around 6', just for small creeks and stuff like that. I knew that 7'6" wouldn't really be a problem though, because my 2 wt is 7'9". The advantage of the added length was apparent while on the river. There are a lot of rocks and chutes in the area I was fishing, which means a lot of seams and differing currents. The extra length of this rod really shined in this type of water where mends are constant. The Guadalupe Bass I was catching were in the seam of an eddy at the base of some very fast chutes where I had to drift the fly down the chute and into the eddy--the length made this a little easier too because I could high-stick the rod for a little more control (it also doesn't hurt that I'm 6'4" so I have long arms anyway). I guess what I'm saying is that when I bought the rod I was just a tiny bit disappointed that it was as long as it is, but after 3 days on the river I am no longer disappointed--in fact I'm glad it isn't any shorter.
And now let me mention where this rod
really shines--playing fish. I was thrilled with the sensitivity of the rod. I have always been a huge Sage fan, but this rod totally blows my light weight Sage rods away. The smallest bream that I caught still felt great on the rod, and the big Longears and small Bass were really a blast! I was using 6x tippet initially, and was delighted to see how much shock the tip of the rod absorbs. The rod really allows these small to medium size fish to show their stuff. I can't wait to get into some larger fish to see how it handles them. I know I won't be horsing any 8lb bass up out of the lily pads, but I'm confident that in open water, playing a larger fish will not be a problem.
A couple final points. This rod is advertised as weighing 1.5 ounces. I'm always skeptical of manufacturer's "claimed" weights, so this evening when I returned home from this trip, I pulled the rod out and weighed it on a very accurate digital scale. The rods actually weighs 1.
4 ounces! How often does that happen? Lighter than advertised. With my Orvis BBS I reel mounted, and with the line strung up, the rod balances just slightly
forward of the end of the grip! This is the first time I've had a lightweight rod with
a reel that was too light! If I mount my first generation Orvis Battenkill Large Arbor I reel on the rod it balances perfectly for me at about an inch from the front end of the cork grip. The difference between the two reels really isn't that noticeable though, so I'll probably continue to use the BBS I on this rod just because it looks better.
And lastly, the line. This is the WF1 Generation 3 Wonderline. My inital impression is that it casts very nicely and shoots well. It feels well balanced with the rod, but.... the memory on this line is horrible! I have a 1st gen 4 wt Wonderline which I've never had any problems with, and most of my other lines are Cortland and they're all fine. The only other line I've used that has memory as bad as this 3rd Gen Wonderline is a Rio Saltwater Line. The water I was fishing was cool, but still over 50 degrees, and the air temperature was in the 60's. Several times each day I would strip out 40' or so of line and pull and stretch it to warm it up in an attempt to straighten it, but it didn't seem to do much good. I know part of the problem is the small diameter of the BBS 1 reel, but I have a Cortland 444SL and a Cortland Lazerline on the same size spools, and neither coils as badly as this new Wonderline. It's not a huge problem, but I'll probably try a different line once this one wears out.
Bottom line: I love the rod and have no regrets about the purchase. I collect watches and had to sell a favorite to finance this rod but it turned out great. I'm afraid my 2 wt is going to spend a lot more time in its rod tube than it's used to because I have a new favorite UL rod. Highly Recommended.
If anyone in the DFW would like to try it out, just let me know. I'd be happy to get together on a creek somewhere to do a little product testing
Regards,
Jerry