Author |
Message |
GuideGun
|
Posted: Sun Jan 03, 2021 9:25 pm • # 1 |
|
|
Newbie |
Joined: 01/03/21 Posts: 7
|
Greetings all,
I'm an curious as what everyone considers to be the most ultra ultralight weight fly rod available? I know Sage made the 000 for awhile. It seems all they offer now is the Dart in a 0 weight, but it is a fast action. But what about other 0 weights that have extremely ultralight action?
I'm looking to go the most extreme I can for fun. The rod would be used on calm days in backwoods beaver ponds for native brook trout here in Maine. I have some 3-weight fiberglass rods, so I truly am looking to push the envelope further into ultralight territory. No preference for glass or graphite.
|
|
Top |
|
PampasPete
|
Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2021 9:50 am • # 2 |
|
|
Hero Member |
Joined: 09/09/14 Posts: 520 Location: southern Brazil
|
GuideGun, welcome to the forum!
The sub-zero UL fly rods and lines have become hard to find, especially new ones. What come to my mind are the RDP rods and blanks in IM6 carbon fiber, especially the 5’8” model. I don’t know of anything that is currently being produced below a 0-weight, but there might be something. Another option would be to stay on the lookout for a used Sage 000-weight rod or line.
|
|
Top |
|
wheezeburnt
|
Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2021 1:39 pm • # 3 |
|
|
Hero Member |
Joined: 12/29/12 Posts: 1839 Location: Rusagonis, New Brunswick, Canada
|
Any theories on why the 00 and 000 weight rods fell out of favour? Too exclusive a market? brent
|
|
Top |
|
PampasPete
|
Posted: Tue Jan 05, 2021 9:31 am • # 4 |
|
|
Hero Member |
Joined: 09/09/14 Posts: 520 Location: southern Brazil
|
Brent, I honestly don’t know why the 00- and 000-weights ceased to be produced and commercialized and therefore I can only speculate.
Reading some of the earlier posts about the subject, we can see that those line weights were always a bit controversial. They were in fact never made official by the AFTMA/AFFTA; they were simply designated as such by Sage. Later on the manufacturer even changed the actual grain weights of the lines. Very few others, if any, made rods for those line weights, and it is doubtful if anyone else commercially made lines in those weights.
Perhaps we can see something similar with other ultralight line weights. Some bamboo rod makers offered rods for line sizes that are equivalent to 2- and 3-weights between 1895 and 1920. Those were apparently forgotten about until ultralight fly rods came back into being in the 1970s or ‘80s.
Now let’s look on the bright side. Perhaps the concept of 00- and 000-weight lines and rods is a fantastic idea whose time has simply not yet come. I think that what GuideGun proposes is the ideal application for such tackle: fishing certain waters for brook trout.
|
|
Top |
|
wheezeburnt
|
Posted: Tue Jan 05, 2021 4:55 pm • # 5 |
|
|
Hero Member |
Joined: 12/29/12 Posts: 1839 Location: Rusagonis, New Brunswick, Canada
|
Thanks for your insights, Pete. Things I wouldn't have thought of. brent
|
|
Top |
|
SWCR
|
Posted: Wed Jan 06, 2021 12:06 am • # 6 |
|
|
Full Member |
Joined: 05/02/13 Posts: 136
|
When you get down to the lines for the ultra lite's is where it gets really controversial, as well as contradicting to actual approved line wts.
SAGE (TXL / QT) Standards Chart Fly Line Rating: Ideal Weight (grains): (1 Gram = 15.4323584 Grains) Acceptable Grain Range: *Estimate* 000 wt 57 56-58 00 wt 60 59-62 0 wt 65 63-67 AFTMA FLY Line Standards Chart Fly Line Rating: Ideal Weight (grains): (1 Gram = 15.4323584 Grains) Acceptable Grain Range: 1 wt 60 54-66 2 wt 80 74-86 3 wt 100 94-106 4 wt 120 114-126 5 wt 140 134-146
|
|
Top |
|
lka
|
Posted: Wed Jan 06, 2021 2:44 am • # 7 |
|
|
Full Member |
Joined: 04/04/18 Posts: 211 Location: Idaho
|
For me, it is simply that I have a 0wt that bends nearly to the cork on a 3" bluegill, and as such I have trouble imagining any sort of fishing I might do for which a lighter rod than that would be better. I don't fish for particularly big fish most of the time, and I still think the 1wt is a better tool than the 0wt 80% of the time.
|
|
Top |
|
SWCR
|
Posted: Wed Jan 06, 2021 12:06 pm • # 8 |
|
|
Full Member |
Joined: 05/02/13 Posts: 136
|
While I have built both 0wt and 1wt (both 7'6") I really could not in all reality determine too much difference in the 2
|
|
Top |
|
toothybugs
|
Posted: Wed Jan 06, 2021 1:38 pm • # 9 |
|
|
Full Member |
Joined: 02/06/13 Posts: 136
|
The lightest rod I've ever touched is an SPL 080-3. Every other 0wt I've cast liked a 1 or 2 line better than the incredibly light lines that rod casts.
When you get this close to a mass-free fly line, the error tolerances become very challenging to manage, let alone if we can even discern a useful difference. At some point we like and tend to get caught up in the nomenclature instead of the actual practicality of something. Like those guys who obsessively tie on tiny hook sizes. One company's 18 is another's 22 (TMC vs Firehole comes to mind). They're really similar in actual size but there's the allure of saying you caught all your fish on a 22.
To use Ron's chart, if you dropped from a 1wt line (60gr) and followed the extrapolation down, your 0 should be around 50, 00 would be around 40, and your 000 around 30. Yikes, and to think of having some tolerances plus separation between line weights??? Put some Gink on your backing and cast it, it's about the same - probably within tolerances - at that point.
**Edited for correct grains
|
|
Top |
|
GuideGun
|
Posted: Wed Jan 06, 2021 5:01 pm • # 10 |
|
|
Newbie |
Joined: 01/03/21 Posts: 7
|
From what I've read, that SPL sounds exactly like the rod I'm looking for. Now to find one.
|
|
Top |
|
SWCR
|
Posted: Wed Jan 06, 2021 11:26 pm • # 11 |
|
|
Full Member |
Joined: 05/02/13 Posts: 136
|
I was using an Orvis Silver label 1 wt on both of those rods, and now they are on both of my 7'6" 1wt
|
|
Top |
|
PampasPete
|
Posted: Sat Jan 09, 2021 12:52 pm • # 12 |
|
|
Hero Member |
Joined: 09/09/14 Posts: 520 Location: southern Brazil
|
In order to read an interesting discussion of the topic in an old thread, you can use the search function of this forum and type in “Rio Trout UL Fly Lines”.
|
|
Top |
|
canefly
|
Posted: Sat Jan 23, 2021 5:32 pm • # 13 |
|
|
Newbie |
Joined: 01/20/21 Posts: 45
|
Terenzio in Italy makes silk lines in 1,0,00 and 000 Artificial silk which looks and feels the same. I find on my TXL 000710-3 the 00 silk works nicely. This is 47 grains 1st 30 feet excluding the level tip. I have tried two 40 grain Rio lines on that rod and they didn’t load it enough. Well? With a following breeze it was better!
|
|
Top |
|
PampasPete
|
Posted: Mon Jan 25, 2021 10:50 am • # 14 |
|
|
Hero Member |
Joined: 09/09/14 Posts: 520 Location: southern Brazil
|
Canefly, thanks for the info on Terenzio artificial silk lines. It makes sense that “silk” lines would be a good option, as the first truly UL fly lines were made of silk well over a hundred years ago. Here, incidentally, is an interesting old thread about UL silk lines. viewtopic.php?f=68&t=459For me it was a breakthough when I started using nylon for fly lines. That is, the twisted (furled) nylon that is used here by commercial fisherman for their destructive gill nets, which is just like what is used by carpenters and masons in the US for their dry lines. It’s basically a matter of finding the right diameter to provide the correct weight when treated and then having dressing applied. I have used them in the following weights: 35-38 grains (0-weight?), 54 grains (0- or 1-weight), and 78 grains (2-weight). They work fine for me, and the key to making sub-zero rods work out well is finding an appropriate line.
|
|
Top |
|
canefly
|
Posted: Mon Jan 25, 2021 1:29 pm • # 15 |
|
|
Newbie |
Joined: 01/20/21 Posts: 45
|
Hello Pete
Just read that silk article thanks! Quite a few negative replies because of the maintenance which is fair enough! These artificial silk lines don’t have those issues. I do grease them up a few times to start with and then they just go all season!
I like your nylon/furled fly line idea! Never thought of that and I do use short furled tapered leaders on my ultralight rods! Easy to custom yo your needs i guess? Which rod did you cast the 34 grain line on? I cant get anywhere near that weight with my TXL-000710-3 Not with my usual casting range of 10-30 feet including the leader,tippet and rod (15 feet roughly) The 47 grain silk or 50 grain pvc is great though! I guess if I was lifting off 30 feet of line and shooting it? The lower grsin weight would work,on a lake that would be ok Not on a stream though.
|
|
Top |
|
canefly
|
Posted: Mon Jan 25, 2021 2:05 pm • # 16 |
|
|
Newbie |
Joined: 01/20/21 Posts: 45
|
Terenzio used Rio’s grain weight chart from 12 years back or so! This was as follows- 1wt-60 0wt-53 00wt-47 000wt-40
Interestingly the Rio grain weight chart for the LT DT Now reads as follows- 1wt-66 0wt-58 00wt-50 000wt-40 The newer Rio Light line also follows this newer chart. But its the older one he goes by! Which is good because 0wt is 53 grains and outside of the AFTM standard of 54-66 grains for a 1wt I have no connection to Terenzio,just like using his lines btw
|
|
Top |
|
PampasPete
|
Posted: Mon Jan 25, 2021 2:33 pm • # 17 |
|
|
Hero Member |
Joined: 09/09/14 Posts: 520 Location: southern Brazil
|
|
Top |
|
canefly
|
Posted: Mon Jan 25, 2021 3:14 pm • # 18 |
|
|
Newbie |
Joined: 01/20/21 Posts: 45
|
That is great Pete! According to Bill Byrd? When the TXL 000wt 1st came out,he said it was 32 grain rod! Then the lines made were 60 odd grains haha Yours is a true 000 or off the scale! Funny? Earlier I was thinking about converting an ultralight casting rod that is also 5ft10” and much much lighter than a Sage 000wt! This leads me to the OP’s post? Rods much lighter can be made and a few countries could make them! So isn’t there a market for them?
|
|
Top |
|
Canoeman1947
|
Posted: Tue Jan 26, 2021 12:35 am • # 19 |
|
|
Hero Member |
Joined: 01/26/09 Posts: 617 Location: Oklahoma
|
Since you are already accustomed to glass, I would recommend you check out Graywolf Rods. He makes an 0 weight rod built from an S-glass blank by Ben's of Holland.
Larry
|
|
Top |
|
canefly
|
Posted: Tue Jan 26, 2021 4:02 am • # 20 |
|
|
Newbie |
Joined: 01/20/21 Posts: 45
|
Last year I had a 5ft7” 0wt S-Glass built by Rawson Uk Its a sweet stick in tight brush
|
|
Top |
|